General Tags :
ntu
study
us

Study: Money Doesn't Grow on Trees, but Congress Spends Like it Does

Mon, Nov 05, 2007

Changing leaves don't mean changing fiscal priorities - not for the 110th Congress, which returned from its pre-autumn recess to pluck the "green" trees of taxpayer dollars. Legislators proposed more spending cuts than in recent years, but the fiscal agendas of fewer than one in seven Representatives and one in 10 Senators would reduce taxpayers' tabs, according to the National Taxpayers Union Foundation's (NTUF) latest BillTally report.

"It's often said that money doesn't grow on trees, but based on Congress' overall fiscal work product, taxpayers would think this adage never reached Capitol Hill," said Demian Brady, NTUF Senior Policy Analyst and BillTally Director. The study also found:

  • A "do-nothing" Congress costs less. If the House passed all bills introduced during the opening months of this Congress, spending would increase by $1.5 trillion (excluding overlaps), or $42,840.50 per household. Senate bill sums would soar to $958 billion, or $26,239.54 per household.
  • The Democratic majority isn't sticking to "fiscal discipline." Though House Democrats each called for a savings average of $731 million, this offsets 0.2 percent of their spending-hike bills, resulting in a net agenda of $470.1 billion - the highest among the past nine Congresses. House Republicans on average sponsored savings of $6.5 billion, offsetting 70.6 percent of their proposed increases for a net agenda of $2.7 billion - the lowest since the 106th Congress. Spending agendas for the typical Senate Democrat and Republican totaled $48.4 billion and $696 million, respectively.
  • Spending still overwhelms savings. The ratio of spending-increase to spending-decrease bills has declined, but budget boosts still dominate fiscal agendas. For every House bill that would reduce spending, there were 20 proposals to increase it. The Senate, there were nearly 33 increases for every reduction.

Since 1991, BillTally has computed a "net annual agenda cost" for each Member of Congress based on individual sponsorships of legislation. The study illustrates the fiscal behavior of lawmakers, free from the influence of committees, party leaders, and floor vote rules. All cost estimates for bills are obtained from third-party sources or are calculated from neutral data.

Source: National Taxpayers Union

Tags: ntu  study  us 
Post to: DiggDigg, RedditReddit, SlashdotSlashdot,
0 Comment(s). Post a comment
Add your comment

Code        

 

  Other Articles :

  

Bozell Blasts CNN for Serial Hillary Clinton Assistance

  

Pelosi Statement on World AIDS Day

  

$82.7 Million Provided to Tribal Communities for Law and Justice System Improvements

  

» Study: Money Doesn't Grow on Trees, but Congress Spends Like it Does

  

Brzezinksi Tells Bloomberg TV: Obama Would Be a Better President

  

Does George Bush want a merger between the US, Mexico and Canada?

  

Hillary Clinton Widens Her Lead Over Barack Obama

 
© TAUME.COM